Since 1901! The oldest continuously running democratic club in the nation.
New to the site? Check out the first post, Welcome...

Health Care Town Hall Meeting

March 7th, 2006 6:50 am

Got this in email from a friend at IU. Sound slike a very interesting event for those interested in the health care issue. I’ll reproduce it in full until I can find a link for it.

Citizen Input Sought At Town Hall Meeting on Health Care

INDIANAPOLIS – Indiana residents are invited to participate in a national conversation on health care during a virtual town hall meeting Wednesday, March 22.

“What is Your Health Worth? A National Conversation on Health Care” is the theme of the discussion of the simultaneous public meetings at the Big Ten Conference schools and 11 other schools of public health around the country.

The meeting is coordinated by the University of Michigan in conjunction with the national Citizens’ Health Care Working Group, a 15-member panel formed by Congress to find out what the public thinks about the accessibility, cost and quality of health care. That input will be used for policy recommendations to the federal government.

Locally, residents can participate in the conversation at the University Place Hotel and Conference Center, 850 W. Michigan St., on the Indiana University- Purdue University Indianapolis campus. IUPUI is hosting the event from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The actual Webcast will be from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. This program will be moderated by Stephen J. Jay, M.D., chairman of the Indiana University School of Medicine Department of Public Health.

At Purdue University, the virtual meeting will be telecast in Stewart Center, room 218, in West Lafayette.

Hoosiers also can participate in the discussion as part of the “virtual” audience by logging on to www.umich.edu/healthmeeting. There are links at the site for additional information and a place for submitting personal suggestions and concerns about the state of health care in America.

Five panelists located at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor will join each of the town hall meeting sites by satellite link. Questions will be posed to those in the audience who will discuss them, make recommendations and share their input electronically with the panelists. The panelists, in turn, will share the recommendations from all the various meeting sites with the remote audience.

Panelists include:

· Patricia Maryland, Dr.P.H., a member of the Working Group and president of St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Service Inc. in Indianapolis. She previously held positions at Cleveland Clinic and Sinai-Grace Hospital in Detroit.

· Mary Sue Coleman, president of the University of Michgan. She co-chaired the Institute of Medicine’s Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance, which issued recommendations in 2004 about how to extend coverage to more citizens.

· Catherine McLaughlin, professor of health management and policy at the University of Michigan School of Public Health and director of the university’s Economic Research Initiative on the Uninsured. She also is a member of the Working Group.

· Deborah Stehr, a member of the Working Group and a health care advocate who serves as full-time care-giver for her adult son, Jonathon, who has cerebral palsy. A resident of Iowa, she has served on the boards of the Iowa Citizen Action Network and USAction.

· Kenneth Warner, dean of the University of Michigan School of Public Health. Warner has spent decades research the effects of tobacco control policies. In his role as dean, he advocates disease prevention and health promotion through a robust public health system.

For more information about the Citizens’ Health Care Working Group, see www.citizenshealthcare.gov/.

Bush at 37% In Indiana

March 6th, 2006 5:48 am

President Bush losing support among Hoosiers | IndyStar.com

Indiana voted twice to elect George W. Bush to the White House, but an Indianapolis Star poll indicates more than half of Hoosiers now disapprove of the job he’s doing as president.

Only 37 percent of those surveyed last week think Bush is doing a good job as president, while 56 percent disapprove.

Other interesting numbers from the poll:

The economy
• Approve: 39%
• Disapprove: 55%
• Not sure 6%

The federal budget
• Approve: 27%
• Disapprove: 63%
• Not sure 10%

The The fight against terror
• Approve: 52%
• Disapprove: 41%
• Not sure 7%

Immigration policy
• Approve: 23%
• Disapprove: 61%
• Not sure 16%

5 GOP Indiana Congressmen Vote For Torture

December 15th, 2005 9:10 am

WASHINGTON (AP) - In a symbolic move, the House endorsed a Senate-passed ban on cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of foreign terrorism suspects Wednesday as negotiations between the White House and Sen. John McCain over the provision appeared at an impasse.

Approved 308-122, the procedural vote puts political pressure on House negotiators - but does not require them - to include the ban and another provision standardizing interrogation techniques used by U.S. troops in a final wartime military spending bill.

121 of the 122 Nay votes were Republicans. 5 of those were Indiana Republicans. If you are a constituent of one of the following Congressional Representatives, contact them and ask them why they support torture.

Also, thank the 4 who voted for this measure, even if they are Republicans. Urge the two Republicans who voted for the measure to continue to support it when a real bill for this reaches the House floor.

It is very interesting how out of the three Republicans in the closes House races in Indiana for ‘06 (Chocola, Sodrel & Hostettler), two of them voted for the symbolic measure supporting the torture ban - Chocola and Sodrel. But Hostettler still voted against it. It will also be interesting to compare this symbolic vote to an actual future vote on the compromised bill if/when it finally makes the floor of the House. Will Chocola and Sodrel still make the same stand then?

Rep. Steve Buyer (IN-04) Silences Veterans

November 10th, 2005 12:18 pm

Via Think Progress:

On Tuesday — three days before Veterans Day — House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Steve Buyer (R-IN) announced that for the first time in at least 55 years, “veterans service organizations will no longer have the opportunity to present testimony before a joint hearing of the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees.”

Contact Rep. Buyer and ask him why he feels our veterans should not have a voice before Congress on Veterans Day:

Washington, DC
2230 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5037

Monticello, IN
100 S. Main Street
Monticello, IN 47960
(574) 583-9819

Plainfield, IN
148 N. Perry Road
Plainfield, IN 46168
(317) 838-0404

Bedford, IN
1801 “I” Street
Bedford, IN 47421
(812) 277-9590

If you are a 4th district constituent you can use the Write Your Representative form here: http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Hostettler Goes After Divorce

August 24th, 2005 11:30 am

Via the DCCC and Atrios.

Rep. John Hostettler, from Indiana’s 8th District, is now broadening his attacks on the freedom for people to marry who they want to the freedom to divorce.

Rep. John Hostettler told area clergy that divorce on demand is as dangerous as gay marriage, and pastors’ actions will be key to strengthening all Indiana families.

[…]

“The picture of marriage is the picture of Christian salvation,” said Hostettler, who describes his elected office as a ministry. “Any diminishing of that notion - whether homosexual marriage or any other degradation of marriage - is something we must fight in public policy.”

[…]

While Hostettler’s comments energized the group, laws governing marriage are rooted primarily at the state level. Enter the Indiana Family Institute [a nonprofit with close ties to Focus on the Family] and its lobbying efforts to strengthen state law’s stances on family.
(Source: Evansville CourierPress)

Apparently Rep. Hostettler thinks that we should enforce Christain Theocracy onto all of America’s citizens when it comes to anything connected to the issue of marriage. Let Rep. Hostettler know that America is not a theocracy.

And some statistics for Rep. Hostettler. If his theory is correct, that the degradation of marriage is such a danger, then you would expect those areas of the country that are the most “blue” (and the most supportive of such “degradation”) would be the most “degraded,” correct?

“Red states have a divorce rate 27% higher than blue states.”

Another quote from the original article that really puzzled me…

“Christians make the best citizens because we don’t answer just to local magistrates,” [Rev. Paul] DeHart [of the Newburgh Church of Christsaid] said.

Is Rev. DeHart actually implying that only Christains are the best (true?) citizens of this nation? I certainly hope not.

Bush Below 50% in Indiana

June 29th, 2005 9:55 am

The newest Survey USA poll shows Bush at 48% approve/48% disapprove in Indiana and under 40% among Independants in the state.

Update: Forgot to mention that Bush is also at only 37% among self-professed Moderates in teh state as well.

Something odd about the poll though, the way I’m reading it, were no African Americans surveyed in Indiana for this poll? That would explain why it shows Indianapolis at 50% for Bush and it would seem to me that the 48% disapprove might be a little low.

Update: I emailed SurveyUSA about the 97% white makeup of the poll in Indiana. I will post any response I get.

Update 2: A response from Survey USA. They say it was just a cut & paste error, that the approval percentages are correct but the racial breakdown percentages were not.

The data has been corrected, and the web page should now be refreshed.

There was a problem with the DISPLAY of our data, but not with the
underlying data itself.

It was (to slightly over-simplify it, but not misstate it) a cut and
paste problem on our end.

The correct % of African Americans were interviewed and were reflected
in our original results, and now are displayed correctly.

Many thanks for your careful scrutiny.

Now the data shows
89% White
7% African America
3% Hispanic
1% Other

via kos.

How two Indiana GOP Congressmen “support our troops”

June 1st, 2005 6:49 am

Via the DCCC’s Stakeholder blog and an email to DCCC mailing list members:

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee began airing radio ads in a dozen Congressional districts over the Memorial Day weekend, accusing Republican incumbents of not putting their money where their mouths are when it comes to supporting U.S. troops.

The ad highlights the Members’ recent vote against a procedural motion that would have expanded a military health insurance program to members of the Reserves and National Guard. Currently the TRICARE program is only available to those men and women on active duty in the armed forces.

“Last week, Congress defeated a plan to extend health coverage to members of the Guard and Reserves and their families,” an announcer says in the ad, which rotates in the name of each local lawmaker. “Congressman [insert name] was among those who voted to deny these heroes the health care they deserve. Tell Congressman [insert name] he owes those who serve our nation more than Memorial Day speeches.”

Indiana is the only state to have the dubious honor of having two of the targeted GOP congressmen, Rep. John Hostettler from the 8th and Rep. Mike Sodrel from the 9th.

Keep reading for contact info for Reps. Hostettler and Sodrel and how to donate to support the DCCC ad buy.
Read the rest of this entry »

Reminder to Call Senator Lugar

May 20th, 2005 6:34 am

Just a reminder to everyone to call Senator Lugar’s office abotu supporting the filibuster. More information here.

Tell Senator Lugar to Keep the Filibuster!

May 18th, 2005 8:52 am

With the Republicans’ so-called “nuclear option” to destroy the filibuster likely coming up in the Senate this week, it’s VERY important to contact Senator Lugar about this and tell him to SUPPORT the filibuster in the Senate and not allow the extremists in his party to set his agenda. You can find out how to call Senator Lugar’s office here.

For a little history and detailed information on just what the “nuclear option” is, read this excellent article on DailyKos.

Remember, while the Senate has confirmed 95% of President Bush’s judicial nominees (with only 10 not being confirmed) , the Republicans blocked 35% of President Clinton’s judicial nominees (64 of them) through various means.

This is not a “constitutional option.” This is not reining in an out of control minority. This is an attempt to circumvent Senate rules to allow the majority to pack the courts, specifically coming lifetime Supreme Court vacancies, with extremist judges.

Call Senator Lugar - it might be the most important phone call you make this week.

Update: Senator Frist says Filibusters are okay, as long as it’s just one and it’s, you know, on his side of the aisle.

Rep. Chris Chocola (R-IN2) Supports Total Privatization of Social Security

May 12th, 2005 9:40 am

A bit late to the game here on this quote, but Hoosier Seniors in the 2nd Congressional District - is this the sort of policy you want your Congressman to support? Rep. Chocola, of course, insists he never said he wants to totally privatize social security.

“Bush’s plan of individual investment of 2 percent of the money is a start. Eventually, I’d like to see the entire system privatized.”

Actual news clipping of the quote from Chocola

Via an older TPM entry, via various other blogs.

Choose from Full RSS or comments RSS feeds.
Indiana Democratic Club is powered by WordPress 2.2 and delivered to you in 1.190 seconds.
Theme modified from Mallow, WordPress 1.5 Default Theme and custom elements.